Dan H. Griffith
Q.Arb., BA, MA, JD
Partner, Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator
Dan H. Griffith is a partner at ATAC LAW and a litigator whose work is conducted in the courtroom, in civil and criminal matters alike, and carried to appeal where the result requires it. He acts for individuals, privately held businesses and their shareholders, strata corporations, beneficiaries and personal representatives of estates, and professionals answering to their regulator. He founded ATAC LAW with Mike Stewart, and has practised in civil litigation and in criminal defence since his call to the bar, appearing also before administrative tribunals in tenancy, driving, and immigration matters. That combination is uncommon, and it informs how he prepares, since a criminal trial teaches the discipline of proving a fact and a civil trial the discipline of proving a loss.
His civil practice is conducted principally in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. He acts in estate and trust disputes, among them contested probate, the setting aside of settlements, and claims concerning the dissipation of estate assets, and in shareholder disputes brought as oppression or derivative proceedings or resisted upon a petition for liquidation. He advances and defends claims in contract and tort, acts for strata corporations, conducts injury and coverage claims against insurers, and applies for and opposes interim injunctions and orders for contempt. He carries a matter through pleadings, document production, examinations for discovery, applications, and summary or full trial.
In criminal matters he appears in the Provincial Court of British Columbia, obtains and presses for Crown disclosure, conducts voir dires on the admissibility of evidence, including the continuity of exhibits and the product of surveillance, negotiates resolution with Crown counsel, and makes submissions on sentence. His appellate practice follows from both sides of that work. He drafts factums and appears in chambers before the Court of Appeal for British Columbia, applies for and resists stays of execution, and has argued appeals concerning dismissal for want of prosecution.
Dan appears as counsel in commercial and statutory arbitration, including under the underinsured motorist provisions, drafting notices to arbitrate, conducting the pre-hearing process, and making submissions on costs once an award has issued. He attends mediation with clients and prepares the brief upon which it turns, and is a Qualified Arbitrator with ADRBC. He defends professional engineers before Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia and lawyers under investigation by the Law Society of British Columbia, attending the regulator's interview alongside the client and negotiating the terms of a consent order. He forms a view early of what the evidence will bear and says so plainly, whether the answer is that a matter should be settled or that it should be tried and, if necessary, appealed.
- Administrative Tribunal Advocacy
- Commercial Real Estate and Disputes
- Construction Law
- Corporate & Commercial Law
- Criminal Defence
- EGBC Discipline Defence and Appeals
- Employment Litigation
- Estate Litigation Law
- Expropriation Law
- Indigenous Economic Development
- Infrastructure Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- Litigation and Dispute Resolution
- Personal Injury
- White-collar Crime Law
- Member, Law Society of British Columbia
- Member of the Alternate Dispute Resolution Institute of British Columbia (ADRBC)
- Bachelor of Arts in Political Science (magna cum laude, departmental honours), University of Oregon – 2009
- Master of Arts in Political Science, University of British Columbia – 2011
- Juris Doctor, University of British Columbia – 2014
- Successfully Appealed Immigration Denial
- Successfully Overturned 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition
- Successfully Overturned and Shortened Driving Prohibitions
- Successfully represented a prohibited driver who was charged with driving while prohibited and was facing a year-long driving ban, arguing that the police officer was mistaken in his identification of the accused as the driver. The court acquitted the client of all charges at trial.
- Successfully defended a man charged with multiple driving offences who was alleged to have run over a pedestrian in downtown Vancouver, causing the victim to suffer serious health issues. The motorist, who had an “N” licence, was alleged to have been sipping wine and eating a charcuterie board while driving through a busy urban area. The motorist had also made a statement to police which the Crown attempted to rely on as a confession. Dan successfully challenged the admissibility of the confession and trial and obtained an acquittal for the client on all charges.
- Represented a truck driver who was alleged to have driven the wrong way on Coquihalla Highway during the middle of a snow storm, potentially putting multiple motorists at risk of serious collisions. At trial, Dan undermined the investigator’s identification of the accused, resulting in an acquittal.
- Client Acquitted of Driving While Prohibited at Trial
- Charge of Driving While Prohibited Dropped by Negotiation
- Client Acquitted of Excessive Speeding Traffic Ticket at Trial
- Commercial Driver’s License Saved at Trial
- Charge of Driving While Prohibited Dropped by Negotiation
- Client Acquitted of Multiple Charges at Trial
- Successfully defended a client who was charged with assault following a fistfight in a public park by arguing that the client acted in self-defence. The client was acquitted of the charge at trial.
- Client Acquitted of Dangerous Driving at Trial
- Charge of Mischief Dropped by Negotiation
- Successfully represented a young woman who was charged with driving while prohibited. The police alleged that the driver and the passenger had switched seats while the car was in motion on a highway in order to make it appear that the prohibited driver was actually the passenger. Dan persuaded Crown Counsel to stay all charges before trial.
- Acted for a man who was charged with driving while prohibited. The man’s former lawyer had unsuccessfully challenged the client’s 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition and had accidentally misled the client into believing that he was legally allowed to drive. Dan persuaded the Crown to stay the charges prior to trial.
- Successfully defended a man who was accused of attacking his roommate with a weapon and succeeded in persuading Crown Counsel to issue a stay of proceedings five minutes prior to the start of trial.
- Represented a man charged with dangerous driving as a result of a high-speed chase in an urban area. Dan successfully obtained an acquittal for the client on the dangerous driving charge by calling into doubt the police officer’s identification of the driver at trial.
- Client Acquitted of Assault at Trial
- Successfully Defended Professional Engineer Sued for Negligence at Trial
- Won $750,000.00 for Client Injured by Motor Vehicle Accident through Uninsured Motorist Protection Arbitration
- Successfully Represented Lender in Debt Claim
- Successfully Represented Spouse in Matrimonial Proceeding at Trial and at Court of Appeal
- Successfully Defended Ontario Company from Contempt Proceedings involving Franchise Law and Copyright Claims
- Successfully Defended Pharmacist from Contempt Proceedings