Dan H. Griffith

Q.Arb., BA, MA, JD

Partner, Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator

Dan H. Griffith is a partner at ATAC LAW and a litigator whose work is conducted in the courtroom, in civil and criminal matters alike, and carried to appeal where the result requires it. He acts for individuals, privately held businesses and their shareholders, strata corporations, beneficiaries and personal representatives of estates, and professionals answering to their regulator. He founded ATAC LAW with Mike Stewart, and has practised in civil litigation and in criminal defence since his call to the bar, appearing also before administrative tribunals in tenancy, driving, and immigration matters. That combination is uncommon, and it informs how he prepares, since a criminal trial teaches the discipline of proving a fact and a civil trial the discipline of proving a loss.

His civil practice is conducted principally in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. He acts in estate and trust disputes, among them contested probate, the setting aside of settlements, and claims concerning the dissipation of estate assets, and in shareholder disputes brought as oppression or derivative proceedings or resisted upon a petition for liquidation. He advances and defends claims in contract and tort, acts for strata corporations, conducts injury and coverage claims against insurers, and applies for and opposes interim injunctions and orders for contempt. He carries a matter through pleadings, document production, examinations for discovery, applications, and summary or full trial.

In criminal matters he appears in the Provincial Court of British Columbia, obtains and presses for Crown disclosure, conducts voir dires on the admissibility of evidence, including the continuity of exhibits and the product of surveillance, negotiates resolution with Crown counsel, and makes submissions on sentence. His appellate practice follows from both sides of that work. He drafts factums and appears in chambers before the Court of Appeal for British Columbia, applies for and resists stays of execution, and has argued appeals concerning dismissal for want of prosecution.

Dan appears as counsel in commercial and statutory arbitration, including under the underinsured motorist provisions, drafting notices to arbitrate, conducting the pre-hearing process, and making submissions on costs once an award has issued. He attends mediation with clients and prepares the brief upon which it turns, and is a Qualified Arbitrator with ADRBC. He defends professional engineers before Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia and lawyers under investigation by the Law Society of British Columbia, attending the regulator's interview alongside the client and negotiating the terms of a consent order. He forms a view early of what the evidence will bear and says so plainly, whether the answer is that a matter should be settled or that it should be tried and, if necessary, appealed.

  • Member, Law Society of British Columbia
  • Member of the Alternate Dispute Resolution Institute of British Columbia (ADRBC)
  • Bachelor of Arts in Political Science (magna cum laude, departmental honours), University of Oregon – 2009
  • Master of Arts in Political Science, University of British Columbia – 2011
  • Juris Doctor, University of British Columbia – 2014
  • Successfully Appealed Immigration Denial
  • Successfully Overturned 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition
  • Successfully Overturned and Shortened Driving Prohibitions
  • Successfully represented a prohibited driver who was charged with driving while prohibited and was facing a year-long driving ban, arguing that the police officer was mistaken in his identification of the accused as the driver. The court acquitted the client of all charges at trial.
  • Successfully defended a man charged with multiple driving offences who was alleged to have run over a pedestrian in downtown Vancouver, causing the victim to suffer serious health issues. The motorist, who had an “N” licence, was alleged to have been sipping wine and eating a charcuterie board while driving through a busy urban area. The motorist had also made a statement to police which the Crown attempted to rely on as a confession. Dan successfully challenged the admissibility of the confession and trial and obtained an acquittal for the client on all charges.
  • Represented a truck driver who was alleged to have driven the wrong way on Coquihalla Highway during the middle of a snow storm, potentially putting multiple motorists at risk of serious collisions. At trial, Dan undermined the investigator’s identification of the accused, resulting in an acquittal.
  • Client Acquitted of Driving While Prohibited at Trial
  • Charge of Driving While Prohibited Dropped by Negotiation
  • Client Acquitted of Excessive Speeding Traffic Ticket at Trial
  • Commercial Driver’s License Saved at Trial
  • Charge of Driving While Prohibited Dropped by Negotiation
  • Client Acquitted of Multiple Charges at Trial
  • Successfully defended a client who was charged with assault following a fistfight in a public park by arguing that the client acted in self-defence. The client was acquitted of the charge at trial.
  • Client Acquitted of Dangerous Driving at Trial
  • Charge of Mischief Dropped by Negotiation
  • Successfully represented a young woman who was charged with driving while prohibited. The police alleged that the driver and the passenger had switched seats while the car was in motion on a highway in order to make it appear that the prohibited driver was actually the passenger. Dan persuaded Crown Counsel to stay all charges before trial.
  • Acted for a man who was charged with driving while prohibited. The man’s former lawyer had unsuccessfully challenged the client’s 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition and had accidentally misled the client into believing that he was legally allowed to drive. Dan persuaded the Crown to stay the charges prior to trial.
  • Successfully defended a man who was accused of attacking his roommate with a weapon and succeeded in persuading Crown Counsel to issue a stay of proceedings five minutes prior to the start of trial.
  • Represented a man charged with dangerous driving as a result of a high-speed chase in an urban area. Dan successfully obtained an acquittal for the client on the dangerous driving charge by calling into doubt the police officer’s identification of the driver at trial.
  • Client Acquitted of Assault at Trial
  • Successfully Defended Professional Engineer Sued for Negligence at Trial
  • Won $750,000.00 for Client Injured by Motor Vehicle Accident through Uninsured Motorist Protection Arbitration
  • Successfully Represented Lender in Debt Claim
  • Successfully Represented Spouse in Matrimonial Proceeding at Trial and at Court of Appeal
  • Successfully Defended Ontario Company from Contempt Proceedings involving Franchise Law and Copyright Claims
  • Successfully Defended Pharmacist from Contempt Proceedings

Notable Matters

September 3, 2026

The Bar for Striking a Claim Over Late Disclosure in BC

The Dispute A general contractor built a custom home for two property owners and, once the project finished, sued them for the balance owing on the contract. One of the owners counterclaimed…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Good Faith Limits on a Purchaser’s Completion Discretion

The Dispute A couple building a new house agreed to sell it to a purchaser once construction was finished, with a completion date several months out. On the completion date the purchaser…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Unnamed Lenders and What a Mortgage Secures

The Dispute A property owner held land carrying three mortgages, two of them in foreclosure with roughly a month left to pay them out or lose the property in a sale. Refinancing…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Suitability for Summary Trial Where Credibility Is Key

The Dispute Four companies had bought a group of development properties, financed by a bank loan, and the loan was coming due before development had started. One of the four began looking…

Read More
September 3, 2026

An E-Scooter With Pedals Under the Motor Assisted Cycle Test

The Dispute A man bought an electric scooter with pedals, rode it for years, and treated it as a bicycle that needed no licence and no insurance. One morning a police officer…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Contempt of an Injunction Restraining Defamatory Statements

The Dispute Two shareholders of a private company had been in dispute for years, and during examinations under oath one of them objected to the interpreter and questioned the interpreter's credentials. Over…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Untruthful Discovery Evidence and the Special Costs Threshold in a BC Family Proceeding

The Dispute The claimant had already been through a full trial and a subsequent appeal that varied part of the original order. The proceeding did not end there. A long run of…

Read More
September 3, 2026

An Ex Parte Order Left Unserved for Eleven Weeks

The Dispute A company had been negotiating a business arrangement with an artist, built around her existing body of work and what it might earn. The arrangement was never completed, and the…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Enforcement of a Costs Order Stayed Pending Appeal

The Dispute A trade contractor had been drawn into the litigation that followed a commercial construction project. It had committed months of preparation to a long trial, and then lost the trial…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Judgment Funds Held in Court Against a Pending Set-Off

The Dispute Two former spouses had been through a trial and an appeal, and the result left one of them owing the other a sum in the low six figures. That money…

Read More
September 3, 2026

The Limitation Period on a Loan Repayable on a Sale

The Dispute Two sisters owned a house together. One of them paid out the five-figure balance owing on the mortgage over it, and the sisters then wrote out a short agreement: the…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Withheld Records as Proof of Minority Shareholder Oppression

The Dispute A shareholder in a taxi cooperative paid a substantial price for a fractional interest in a vehicle and a company operating licence. The company's general manager told her what she…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Getting a Charter Challenge Heard in a Bylaw Prosecution

The Dispute A homeowner was charged with nine bylaw offences over a kitchen, a sundeck, a pool and outbuildings built without permits, and over letting other people occupy the property. Bylaw officers…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Leave to Amend Refused Without Proposed Amendments Before the Court

The Dispute A family became involved in a lengthy dispute with the province after their daughter was taken into government care during a child protection investigation. Once she had been returned to…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Continued Construction in a Building Bylaw Prosecution

The Dispute Bylaw officers searched a residential property in British Columbia under a warrant and found improvements built without building permits, including an added bedroom, a kitchen and sundeck, a pool, a…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Defeating an Income Imputation Claim Over Business Growth

The Dispute A separated father worked for a small import and retail business owned and run by his partner. Years earlier, a court estimated his income partly on undisclosed cash sales in…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Non-Disclosure in an Information to Obtain an Entry Warrant

The Dispute A homeowner learned that someone had used the municipality's website to report a house addition, a pool, a garden suite and a basement suite built without permits. The homeowner treated…

Read More
September 3, 2026

Striking Interest From a Criminal-Rate Promissory Note

The Dispute Two acquaintances in British Columbia carried on two informal money arrangements together in 2018. In one, a lender advanced a series of loans to a business associate, each backed by…

Read More
September 3, 2026

A Sublandlord’s Duty to Keep the Head Lease in Good Standing

The Dispute A pharmacist opened a pharmacy inside a medical building, sharing a unit with a walk-in clinic run by two physicians. The arrangement worked because patients leaving the clinic filled their…

Read More

What Clients Say About Dan H. Griffith

“Dan was pleasant to deal with, very professional. I had a great experience with ATAC Law. Really happy with the result, would recommend to anyone.”
Shawn BartheletteGoogle ReviewVerified review
“Mike and Dan were extremely professional. Wasted no time and got straight to the point. Highly recommended.”
Byron ParkinsGoogle ReviewVerified review
“Dan has helped me over 3 times and all wins ( traffic court ) he gives great knowledge and treats you like family great services I'd recommend him to anyone !”
R3PRGoogle ReviewVerified review
“Sometimes, bad things happen to good people. In my case, this came in the form of a traffic ticket accusing me of excessive speeding. I had retained Mr. Dan Griffith at ATAC LAW Corp. to act on my behalf and defend me in court. His correspondance with follow-up emails displayed effective communication which I greatly appreciated. In court, he was successful in throwing the traffic ticket out and I couldn't be more satisfied with the outcome of this case. I highly recommend retaining Mr. Griffith as your lawyer to defend you in traffic court.”
Edwin YeeGoogle ReviewVerified review
“I had driving violation and with Dan's expertise the ticket was thrown out . Dan kept me in loop as what going on step by step in regards to officer and what's my options. I will definitely recommend him to my friends and family. Job well done !!!”
rude boiGoogle ReviewVerified review
“Good staff, Dan is really knowledgeable and nice.”
sky windGoogle ReviewVerified review
1 / 6